As a young student I remember
writing in school, but don’t remember learning how to write. From what I do remember, I was not ever
taught grammar explicitly. I was taught
what nouns and verbs were, but don’t remember learning other parts of speech
specifically. I don’t remember
ever learning how to diagram sentences or how to construct a good
sentence. I do remember one teacher
showing us examples of paragraphs that she would construct. As I got a little older, I remember
being given a topic that we were to write about, and being expected to do an
outline, rough draft, and final copy.
Peer editing or collaboration with peers was not part of our writing
instruction.
I would say that this takes on more
of an acquisition view although there was no peer interaction and I’m not sure
that the writing was always authentic, but more scripted. Another aspect that I would say
followed the learning view more than acquisition was our weekly spelling
tests. We were given a set of
words each week that we would practice for homework and test on at the end of
the week.
Looking back at my own writing
instruction I think there could have been more of a balance between the two
methods. I do feel that
acquisition allows for more authentic and creative writing, however I do think
that students need to learn the different parts of speech if they are to be
successful with academic language.
I know that for me, writing academic papers has always been very
difficult because I don’t know when I’m making grammatical errors. I also have found that I have a very
hard time peer editing for people because I can’t find their errors. I think there needs to be a balance
between learning and acquisition tasks so that students can explicitly learn
certain skills, but then have many opportunities to practice and go deeper with
authentic reasons for reading and writing.